News

After the Center expresses no opposition, the Delhi High Court orders the unblocking of the Cockroach Janta Party's X Account. 

 

 

On behalf of the Central government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that he had no objections. 

Dipke Abhijeet 
 

After the Central government acknowledged that it had no objections, the Delhi High Court on Tuesday ordered the unblocking of the Cockroach Janta Party's (CJP) X account. 
 

After Solicitor General Tushar Mehta testified on behalf of the Central government and stated that the account could be unblocked, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma issued the order to do so. 
 

The account was disabled because of the National Eligibility and Entrance Test (NEET), SG Mehta continued.It was blocked when the NEET test was scheduled. There would be thousands of pupils. There were other posts (on X) that would have caused havoc among parents and students. The test is now finished," Mehta declared. 
 

The account should then be unblocked, according to Justice Sharma.I don't have any trouble. The SG stated, "I just want everyone to be more cautious." 
Abhijit Dipke, the founder of the CJP, subsequently filed a plea, which the court accepted. 

Swarana Kanta Sharma, Justice 
 

Dipke petitioned the Court to overturn the government's blocking order, which prohibited the handle due to national security concerns. 
Advocate Nakul Gandhi of NG Law Chambers filed the petition. 
 

The Indian Express claims that following information from the Intelligence Bureau (IB) that aroused "national security concerns," the Central government ordered the shutdown of the CJP's X account. 
 

According to the report, X was requested by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to withhold the account in accordance with Section 69 (A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 
 

The High Court had refused to immediately order the account's reactivation during the case's prior hearing on May 29. The Court stated that because the issue has broad ramifications, it can only give such relief after hearing from the government. 
 

The Court further stated that if Union of India submits a thorough response, it would investigate whether X may be ordered to record the blocking order. 
The unblocking today was accepted by the Union administration. 
Recently, a satirical online movement known as the "Cockroach Janta Party" acquired popularity on social media, especially among younger people. 
With hundreds of thousands of followers on X and over 22 million on Instagram, the online movement became extremely popular. 
 

The campaign began on May 15, when the Supreme Court's Bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, voiced worries about young, unemployed attorneys turning to social media and RTI activism instead of practicing law. According to CJI Kant, these "youngsters like cockroaches" were turning into social parasites.Like cockroaches, some young people are unemployed in this field. Some become RTI activists, while others use social media, according to the CJI. 
Later, the CJI clarified that his findings did not apply to young Indians without jobs in general, but only to those who entered the workforce using phony degrees and credentials. 
 

Dipke, a Boston, USA resident, founded the group. It makes observations about topics like media freedom, institutional responsibility, and unemployment through political satire. 
Due to the NEET and other question paper leaks, the CJP has been demonstrating at Jantar Mantar and calling for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. 
 

Abhijeet Dipke was represented by Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal, Vrinda Grover, Nakul Gandhi, Darshit Sidhabhatti, Siddhi Sahoo, Krishnesh Bapat, Jahnavi Sindhu, and Aditya Raj Patodia.


Related News

If the accused is served with a consolidated notice of demand, a single complaint for the dishonor of more than three checks may be maintained: The J&K&L High Court

Orissa High Court Shares Concerns About Data Breach & Privacy Violations While Upholding Mandatory PAN-Aadhaar Linking For Demat Accounts

The Supreme Court dismisses the case against a public servant, stating that S. 197 CrPC does not envision the concept of "deemed sanction."