News

Karnataka High Court hearings were suspended for an hour following bar protests over the proposed transfer of four justices. 

On April 21, the Supreme Court Collegium suggested that four justices from the Karnataka High Court be transferred to other High Courts.

 



In protest of the Collegium's recommendation to transfer four Karnataka High Court judges, the Advocates Association of Bengaluru decided to take an hour off from work on Tuesday. 

After the Bar leaders told the Court that it had decided to take an hour off from work in protest, many benches stopped sessions. 

Hearings have been halted for the time being in Courts 7, 8, and 21. 

On April 21, the Supreme Court Collegium suggested that Justices Krishna Dixit, K Natarajan, Hemant Chandangoudar, and Sanjay Gowda be transferred. 

It has been suggested that Justice Dixit be transferred to the High Court of Orissa, Justice Natarajan to the High Court of Kerala, Justice Chandangoudar to the High Court of Madras, and Justice Gowda to the High Court of Gujarat. 

The decision was made "to infuse inclusivity and diversity at the level of High Courts and to strengthen the quality of administration of justice," according to a statement released by the Collegium on the Supreme Court website. 

There is a lot of conflict at the Bar because of the transfer suggestion. In a previous letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI), Sanjiv Khanna, the presidents of the Advocates Associations of the Dharwad Bench of the Karnataka High Court and the Advocates Association, Bengaluru, opposed the action. 

After that, the AAB decided to take an hour off from work. 

 


Related News

If the accused is served with a consolidated notice of demand, a single complaint for the dishonor of more than three checks may be maintained: The J&K&L High Court

Orissa High Court Shares Concerns About Data Breach & Privacy Violations While Upholding Mandatory PAN-Aadhaar Linking For Demat Accounts

The Supreme Court dismisses the case against a public servant, stating that S. 197 CrPC does not envision the concept of "deemed sanction."

Community Invitation

Enjoying LawRead?

You've been reading on LawRead! Create a free student or advocate account to unlock our complete legal platform:

Premium Courses & Mock Tests Judiciary, UGC-NET, and Bar examination lecture bundles, video classes, and structured notes.
Community Discussion Forum Ask legal questions, reply to ongoing case discussions, and connect with legal scholars and peers.
Unlimited PDF Downloads Download Bare Acts, landmark judgments, study notes, and legal updates without any limit.

Sign in to LawRead

Sign In
Create Account
Forgot Password?
New to LawRead? Join Free
Already registered? Sign In

Verify Your Email

Enter the 6-digit OTP sent to

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In

Forgot Password

Enter your registered email address to receive a 6-digit password reset OTP.

Remember your password? Sign In

Create New Password

Enter the OTP sent to and choose a new password.

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In